Ontology and cryptoassets

Una riflessione filosofico-ontologica sulla natura degli oggetti digitali (tra cui i crypto-assets) è sempre più urgente -come scrivevo. Non amo l’espressione ‘oggetto immateriale’ (forse meglio dire ‘oggetto programmabile’), ma qui trovate qualche stimolo concettuale da giurisprudenza e diritto.

“Digital tokens—variously intended to function as currency, as securities, or as vouchers for deferred goods and services—have burst into mainstream legal awareness over the past 12 months as a result of high-worth ‘Initial Coin Offerings’ (‘ICOs’). Prior to the important questions of legal characterisation that digital tokens raise could as ‘money’ or ‘securities’ for the purposes of prudential, capital markets, tax, and other regulations, we must establish how the law takes cognisance of a digital token at all. In this article I argue that no legal system deals adequately with immaterial objects, which include digital tokens but also more traditional money and securities. Establishing a satisfactory legal category for immaterial objects as objects of property law is therefore a necessary first step … I explore the ontology of digital immaterial objects and set out the conceptual basis for a new category of property … (Allen 2018)”

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3140499

Published by

Cosimo Accoto

Research Affiliate at MIT | Author "Il Mondo Dato" (Egea) | Philosopher in Residence | Business Innovation Advisor | www.cosimoaccoto.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.